Flaw of averages

After reading the article The Flaw of Averages, I hold up with accredited statements make by the compose, but I am not in complete agreement with the methodology the author apply. In the article, the author does present a material dead body of valid ex antiophthalmic factorles to tide over his opinions, however I would promise that there are a number of issues that could have been considered that were not. The author tries to make a casing that mean(a)s should not be apply when you need a number. I think using an average when you need a number is fine as bulky as it is enjoymentd appropriately. 2 criteria I would use in determining appropriateness is 1) Averages should be clearly and hi-fily defined. The more this criteria is used the more accurate the average number will be. An grounds should be made to specifically identify what the average represents. 2) entropy should not be random - that is there is some coefficient of correlation as to the beat of ite ms being measured to something else. For manikin - unitary can stomach the sale of lawn mowers to increase during the months of March, April, May & June and decrease in November, December, January & February. If these two criteria were considered in the examples in the article, the author may have decided not to use them after all.

Consider the actuary that drowns. This example leads unmatched to deal he was in a deeper part of the river or confining the center. Using the information provided, we still do not know. Had the statistican considered my criteria, the example would have been stated differen tly. Although the river is on average three ! feet deep, rivers for the most part start shallow at the banks and get deeper the closer one gets to the center. This is a correlation of the... If you compliments to get a ample essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay